The numbers are bigger than you think
Sacred Heart University ran a national poll in 2025 and found that 37.3% of U.S. adults had used an AI tool for health information. Not tech enthusiasts. Not young people exclusively. More than a third of the general population.
That number tracks with what's happening on specific platforms. Perplexity AI is now processing 780 million queries per month, up 239% from 2024. They've grown to 30-33 million monthly active users. ChatGPT's user base is even larger. These aren't theoretical trends. They're patient behaviors happening right now.
And healthcare leads every other industry in AI Overview coverage. When someone types a health question into Google, 51.6% of the time they're seeing an AI-generated answer before they see any traditional search results. No other sector comes close to that rate.
What this looks like in practice
Imagine a woman in her early 30s who's been struggling with irregular cycles. She's heard about NaProTechnology from a friend at church but isn't sure what it involves. Before she picks up the phone to call anyone, she opens ChatGPT or Perplexity and types: "What is NaProTechnology and how is it different from IVF?"
The AI writes an answer. In about 15 seconds, she gets a paragraph that shapes her understanding of an entire medical specialty. If the answer is comprehensive, well-sourced, and accurate, she's more likely to call a practitioner. If it's vague, dismissive, or incomplete, she might not look any further.
That answer isn't written by you. It's assembled from whatever the AI can find online. And this is where the RRM ecosystem has a specific challenge.
The digital presence problem
AI systems can only work with what's available. They don't have insider knowledge. They don't understand nuance that isn't written down somewhere. If a topic has deep, well-structured content across multiple authoritative sources, the AI answer will be detailed and accurate. If the digital footprint is sparse, the AI answer reflects that sparseness.
For NaProTechnology and restorative reproductive medicine, the digital landscape is thinner than it should be. There are excellent clinical resources, but they're often locked behind paywalls, buried in PDFs, or sitting on websites that haven't been updated since 2019. AI systems struggle with all of these formats. They need accessible, crawlable, structured web pages with clear authorship and recent update signals.
This isn't a criticism of any individual practice. It's a landscape-level observation. The RRM ecosystem was built by clinicians focused on patient care, not content strategy. That's entirely understandable. But it means there's a gap between how good the medicine is and how well that medicine is represented in AI answers.
Why this can't wait
There's a compounding effect here. AI systems learn what to prioritize based on what's already online. If Perplexity gives a thin answer about NaProTechnology today, and the patient doesn't follow up, that's a missed connection. But it's also a missed signal to the AI. The system doesn't see strong engagement with NaPro content, so it continues to deprioritize it in future answers.
Meanwhile, other fertility approaches have massive digital footprints. IVF clinics invest heavily in content marketing. Their pages are structured, cited, updated, and interlinked. When AI systems compare sources, the volume and quality disparity makes a difference.
This isn't about outspending anyone. It's about making sure the content that does exist is accessible, structured, and findable by the systems patients are actually using.
What practitioners can do about this
Make sure your site content answers questions directly. AI systems extract answers from pages that make clear, specific claims. "We treat endometriosis, PCOS, recurrent miscarriage, and unexplained infertility using NaProTechnology" is citable. A paragraph about your "holistic philosophy" is not.
Claim and maintain your professional profiles. AI systems cross-reference directory listings. A Healthgrades profile, a Doximity listing, and a practice website that all mention the same physician with the same credentials creates a consistency signal that AI trusts.
Publish answers to the questions patients actually ask. If one in three patients is asking AI before calling, you should know what they're asking. Questions like "Is NaProTechnology covered by insurance?" or "How is NaPro different from fertility awareness methods?" should have clear, direct answers on your website. Not because Google ranks FAQ pages well (it does), but because those are the pages AI systems pull from when constructing answers.
The shift has already happened. Patients aren't waiting for your website to catch up. They're asking AI right now, and the answers are being written with whatever's available. Making sure your practice is part of that equation isn't optional anymore. It's patient communication.
Sources
Frequently asked questions
How many patients use AI for health information?
According to a 2025 Sacred Heart University poll, 37.3% of U.S. adults have used AI for health information. AI platforms like Perplexity process 780 million queries per month, with 30-33 million monthly active users.
Why does the RRM ecosystem have an AI visibility challenge?
Restorative reproductive medicine has excellent clinical resources, but much of this content is locked behind paywalls, in PDF format, or on outdated websites. AI systems need accessible, crawlable, recently updated web pages to generate accurate answers about NaProTechnology and related approaches.
What can a NaPro practice do to improve AI-generated answers about their specialty?
Three actions help: write direct, specific answers to common patient questions on your website; claim and maintain professional directory profiles for consistency signals; and make sure your clinical pages use clear language that AI systems can extract and cite.